Please scroll down to view our articles and photos. Thank you for your visit.

 
Home Sunburst Store More Health News/Reports About Us
 






JoAnne Green, Founder/Editor,/Publisher
JoAnne Green











Even with Copayments for Non-urgent Care, Medicaid Patients Still Rely on ERs Published January 28, 2015

Fast Facts:

  • To rein in unpaid hospital bills and encourage Medicaid recipients to get primary care doctors, between 2002 and 2008, some states began charging copayments for Medicaid patients who got non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments.

  • A new Johns Hopkins study finds copayments did not affect the rate of Medicaid patients’emergency room visits.

  • The study, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, finds copayments did not lead to more primary care doctors’ office visits by Medicaid recipients.

How can states and federal government provide adequate health care to poor people, without overburdening taxpayers or leaving health care providers with billions in unpaid bills? That thorny problem is especially challenging in the aftermath of a recession and congressional mandates expanding Medicaid eligibility. To help control rising costs, in 2005, Congress gave states the option of charging copayments for Medicaid recipients who get non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments, where care is much more expensive than in most doctors’ offices.

But a study conducted by researchers at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health suggests these copayment provisions do not significantly reduce Medicaid recipients’ use of emergency rooms.

The study, published Jan. 26, 2015, in JAMA Internal Medicine, tracked how often Medicaid recipients visited emergency rooms under two different scenarios — in eight states that authorized hospitals to collect copayments for non-urgent care and in 10 states where hospitals were not authorized to collect the copayments. The study, which covered the years 2001 to 2010, found no significant difference in emergency room visits by Medicaid recipients in states with and without copayments, says lead author Mona Siddiqui, M.D., M.P.H., an assistant professor of internal medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

“As states are expanding Medicaid, they are looking for ways to control costs,” says Siddiqui, who is serving on the White House Social and Behavioral Sciences Team through August 2015 as a Science and Technology Policy Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. “Our study suggests they will need to look at other strategies besides requiring copayments. There was little evidence that cost-sharing would have any impact on the use of emergency rooms by poor people, who often have few other health care options.”

Federal law guarantees emergency health care to everyone regardless of their ability to pay, but by 2004, the unpaid Medicaid emergency room bills owed to community hospitals nationwide totaled $40.7 billion. Hospitals absorb some losses, and others fall on the states. In 2002, some states began setting copayments for Medicaid patients whose emergency room visits turned out not to be urgent. But it wasn’t until the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 that states could legally tell hospitals to turn away Medicaid patients who didn’t make a copayment for non-urgent care.

The Johns Hopkins study is the first one to examine the effect of the law while these changes were being phased in and for several years afterward. The researchers looked at data from Medicaid recipients aged 19 to 64 who participated in the nationwide Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. From survey data and billing records, the researchers calculated the rate of emergency room visits per person in each state studied.

The researchers sampled about 3,000 Medicaid recipients in eight states — Florida, Kentucky, Minnesota, Montana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Washington — that set copayments ranging from $3 to $15 per non-urgent emergency room visit. They also sampled about 7,500 Medicaid recipients in 10 states — California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, North Carolina, Virginia and Texas — that did not set copayments.

The researchers found the states with the highest initial rates of emergency room use were also the ones that sought copayments from Medicaid recipients for non-urgent care. But once the copayments went into effect, those states’ emergency room use rates went down less than one-tenth of 1 percent. The data did not show any increase in the rate of Medicaid patients’ visits to doctors’ offices, suggesting they were not switching away from the emergency room and toward primary care physicians.

Senior author Craig E. Pollack, M.D., M.P.H., an associate professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and an expert in health services research, says the findings may reflect some hospital staff members’ reluctance to deny care in cases where Medicaid patients can’t make the copayments. Staff members may also be unsure which cases are true emergencies and which are not.

“The question of whether a need for care is urgent or not is a difficult one, for patients and clinicians,” says Pollack. He and Siddiqui say a lack of access to primary care physicians may be one reason why Medicaid patients continue to seek emergency room care in spite of copayments.

There simply aren’t enough doctors practicing in poor communities to give these patients a real choice, Pollack says. “This is a really vulnerable population,” he says, “and there are questions about whether personal financial responsibility can play a role in improving their health care, or whether a financial requirement restricts their access to health care even further.

“The states are hungry for ways to control costs and expand access to care, and copayments are one attractive option,” Pollack says. “But unfortunately, this may not be the tool to help accomplish that.”

Eric T. Roberts, M.A., of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, is a co-author of the study, which was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Jayne Koskinas Ted Giovanis Foundation for Health and Policy, and the National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute and Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research.


Click here to like us on Facebook.





Most Viewed Articles

A New Study Reveals the Nutrition, Cost and Safety Benefits of Canned Foods
 
Walking May Help Protect Kidney Patients Against Heart Disease and Infections

Food Helps Older Generation Age Successfully

Cosmetic Treatment Can Open the Door to Bacteria

Food Allergy Nearly Doubles Among Black Children
 
How bacteria communicate with us to build a special relationship

Vegetables Can Make You Look Like a Hero, and a Better Cook

Promising Cervical Cancer Study

Better Broccoli, Enhanced Anti-Cancer Benefits with Longer Shelf Life

 



 
Home  Sunburst Store More News/Reports About Us Privacy Pledge Terms of Use Site Map

Copyright © 2017 Sunburst Worldwide Enterprises. All rights reserved.
Warning: All of the pages on this site are protected under U.S. and International Copyright laws.
Reproduction by any means or for any purpose is not allowed without the express written permission of the copyright owner.
SunburstGlobalHealthNews.com is an online publication of Sunburst Worldwide Enterprises.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use.